I wonder if this critical note is more related to the content of the exhibition? such as if the collection in the exhibition is relevant for the motif of the exhibition or if curating this exhibition is necessary? I do critique a bit on the displacement of the work on site.

Taking the right paragraph as an example, I used my own words to introduce the embedding meaning of the work. The information that I got was from the information board in the exhibition. I wonder if I reference content from the information board or the exhibition brochure, do I also need to add this citation to my article?

What is the context awareness?
if this refers to introducing the historical background of the pieces, and in what context, they were created?

what is not clear here? is it because it sounds like I did not explain why it is expecting？when I was writing this sentence，I was thinking，Firstly, for me, only hearing these famous artists"s names apparently has built up ample expectation to see the exhibition.
Secondly, the works were large--scale, therefore they were quite special and people might not always have opportunity to see them.

comment: unclear

Is the strong argumentation more about giving more better relevant resources and examples? Or it is more about using words to sound like I am assertive?

Upon our last lesson relating to posmordenism, you came on to the topic Authorship& The Copy, apparently, a few students were very opinionated about Bas Van Beek，and they were curious to hear how you think of his work. If I understood correctly, your reply was "from a perspective of a designer, what he has been doing in a way was not nice, however, from a perspective of an art historian, his thinking was very interesting." I wonder if this answer of yours counts as a strong opinion because your answer involves two perspectives.
The thing is, For my study here, I have been struggling to give strong opinions, in my case, I always bring up more perspectives to talk about one thing, Which I think it makes people think my opinion not strong enough. because different perspectives kind of neutralise the opinion.